CHIC WeChat Square Code

qrcode_for_gh_a540a1df0cb1_258

Humor Blogs and Articles

What's a 'REAL' evaluation

by Hubert Lin

Listening to a speech is a subjective experience.  A passage that is clear and persuasive to Tom might not have as much impact or can be confusing to Jane.  Perhaps Tom had had similar experiences to the speaker, and therefore could relate to what the speaker was talking about.  But Jane did not have the benefit of shared history and was missing some important background information.  If an audience is homogenous and share the same experience and knowledge, their reaction to the speech may every well be similar—either similarly persuasive, or similarly confusing.   That is why public speaking, or communication in general, is not about how the speaker delivers the message, but it’s about how the listener perceives the message.  This is what makes public speaking so dynamic and exciting: the process of figuring out how the audience would feel, especially when they are from a different background than the speakers themselves.

When it comes to speech evaluation, especially at Toastmasters, it is easy to fall into the trap of assuming there is a standard, an objective measurement.  One particular dangerous and yet common trap is the assumption that advanced speakers cannot benefit from the feedback of beginner speakers.  Because Toastmasters clubs often have members who are at different levels of their Toastmasters career, this misconception about evaluation is particularly counterproductive to the development of speakers and the growth of the club.  Advanced speakers would feel that they have little need of the club, and leave for ‘advanced’ clubs, or leave the organization entirely.  Now, of course we realize we deliver speeches in our Toastmasters club for the purpose of preparing ourselves for the ‘real-world’ presentations, right?  So are we saying that in the real world, our audiences are all advanced speakers?   In the context, I would argue, the most valuable feedback are from:

My Mandarin Humorous Speech Experiment

Every time we deliver a speech, that is an opportunity to improve ourselves, as we try something new, explore different ways of doing things, in order to uncover powerful techniques that you had never believed would work for you.  It is a chance to put the theoretical into practice, so we can verify first hand the advice given by experts or textbooks, or even the Toastmaster Manuals.   It is my hope that all of us at CHIC can embrace this mentality with every precious stage time given to us.

For me, delivering a Mandarin speech is quite special:  I could put myself in most of your shoes, because I’d be speaking in a second language.  I would be able to experience what you experienced, from the difficulty of speech writing, to rehearsal, and all the overwhelming emotions during the delivery.  I hoped that through this experience, I could verify how much of the speech technique is translatable across different languages and culture, and whether the language gap is an obstacle that is worthy of our worries.  We just had our Mandarin Humorous Speech contest this past Wednesday.  There were four techniques I wanted to test out:

 

July31 2010 training: slides

There are the slides.

Framing Your Humorous Story

For the past month, we have experimented with 2 sessions specific to the CHIC Toastmasters Club.  These are: Making Fun of Myself, (Self-Deprecating Humour) and Humour Around Me.  The objective is to use two types of humour effectively in two minutes, as a practice to integrate it to a longer speech.

After one month, it is clear that a critical element that can be learned in these two minutes is how to frame a piece of humorous story around a point.  This revelation coincides with what I learned from Ed Tate at the Shanghai Conference in May 2010.  In his session, he mentioned the framework of story telling:  People, Please, Action and Resolution (the lesson or message).  I wrote a small piece about this earlier.  Delivering a humorous story can be much more effective if this is followed.  And the most important element is the ‘Resolution’:  What did you learn from the story.   The championship speakers have always repeated a mantra about the secret of making messages memorable in a speech:  “Tell a story, make a point.  Tell a story make a point.”   And it is no different with a humorous story.  The point doesn’t have to deeply philosophical, or fully inspiring, or specifically poignant.  It can also be humorous, light, and entertaining.   For the purpose of the two CHIC roles, it is important that the speaker identify the point of the story, and frame it accordingly, within a simple introduction and conclusion.

 

Humor Case Study, Apr 30, 2010

Last meeting, Lisa took on the role to tell 'Humor Around Her'.  This is the first time we implemented this role, and it proves a great opportunity to use this opportunity to analyze the humor: What can we do to improve it?  Below is her story:

I have a colleague who was somewhat overweight, that she has around her belly a bulging layer of fat, that has a shape of  a lifebelt/buoy(救生圈).

One time, we took an international flight for a business trip. When we arrived at the airport, the customs officer asked my friend, pointing to her bulging fat around her belly:  What do you have under your shirt?  My friend answered, ‘This is meat.”  “Meat is not allowed through customs.”  My friend replied: “This is MY meat. 肉”

We can all agree that the story as we picture it is quite an embarrassing and humorous situation.  First, there is a funny image of the fat around her belly.  Second, there is the fact that the officer had mistaken the bulge around her belly as smuggled goods.  The reaction from the audience is, “yeah…the bulging belly does look like she’s smuggling.”  Second, there is the double-meaning (double entendres) of ‘meat’ which refers to the smuggled meat, as well as the friends’ own ‘meat’. 

A further analysis of the story reveals some areas that can enhance the humor in the story.